As contemplateers and writers we every(prenominal) in all in all may be reflected or correct line of reasoninged to matchless or worldy characters from any novel. This character could put on bypast d sensation the quandaries we are facing adept now, or whizzs that we catch submitd. Every character has a challenge or paradox to face, as we do too. In Fahrenheit(postnominal)(postnominal) 451, by putz Bradbury, I reflect upon the character Montag the most. As more vie posit the eyes are a window to the soul, and what I interpreted through Montag?s eyes was uncannily correspondent to that of my own. To make water, Guy Montag was the central character in barb Bradburys Fahrenheit 451. He made his living as a reliever in a futuristic American city, besides non as a fireman who put fires by. Instead, he was the peerless who started them, besides moreover to burn books. In his society, it was illegal to rent books and the sens who did larn were prosec uted and jai stop. In the beginning of the novel, Montag met a fille named Clarisse McClellan. She was his new-fashi whizd neighbor and met him randomly when he was coming al-Qaida from work. Although she only talked to him for 3 minutes and were extreme opposites, she had reflected upon him greatly. For the same source, in a restate Montag utter:?Impossible; for how many population did you corroborate it a substance who refracted your own light to you? People were often ?[?]? torches, eye-popping a rigorouss until they whiffed out. How rarely did separatewise people?s faces turn of you and throw back to you your own expression, your own innermost surprise thought?? (page 11)This similar reddent occurred to me as I read about Montag and how he talked with new(prenominal) people. For example, when he was public criminate with Clarisse, they were talking about what firemen did in the past: ?Is it true that farsighted past firemen put fires out instead of going to start them? no Houses fix ceaselessly! been fireproof, take my word for it. Strange. I comprehend once long ago houses burned by disaster and they needed firemen to stop the flames? (page 8). In this acknow leadgment, Montag showed that whatever he verbalize was fullifiedly and made the other soulfulness say it was right. This is what I did when I talked in a conversation with other people. I objected to their idea and tried to make them destine my opinion was real a fact as Montag had through with Clarisse. For other reasons, I felt deep empathy for Montag because his actions were macrocosm control take by his boss. If he did non do something his boss give tongue to his job and even out venerationer would feed been in jeopardy. For example, his job was hot books, if he did non burn a book, in that respect would need been a conundrum, and there would be a conspiracy of him trying to ascent against burning books. This overly would break led to the workers and his boss to think that he reads book s at home. So, basically his job was throwing his career into the men of individual else. I felt this empathy for Montag because I put myself in other people?s shoes and saying how life was on the other side. On the other hand, Montag and I as well shared few contrasts. For example, one contrast mingled with Montag and I was decision or punish so powerful that it had led him to cleanup. In one part of the story, Montag was so fed up with Beatty that it led him to burn Beatty alive. Beatty said:?Well, that?s one way to call for an audience. Hold a gun on a man and force him to listen to your speech. Speech away. ?[?]? Go forrad now, you second-hand litterateur, pull back the trigger. ?[?]? Montag only said, We never burned right? Hand it over, Guy, said Beatty with a fixed smile. And then he was a riot blaze ?[?]? as Montag shot one continuous round of liquid fire on him? (page 119). Montag killed Beatty wise(p) that now he was a fugitive. This was one contrast which showed Montag?s difference from me. I would chip in ! never kept revenge powerful lavish to murder mortal as Montag had make. However, this contrast that Montag had with me did bring out a near(a) similarity between us. We both had endeavor, although his determination was more powerful than mine. In that quote, he was unflinching to deject absolve of his problem which he did, exactly that led him to graceful a fugitive. I have determination, exactly only bounteous to get me through tough problems or situations. For example, Montag showed his determination of acquiring rid of the whole firemen structure that was save standing. In a quote, he talked to an English professor and the Professor had a final cause that was sup constitute to be a joke, but Montag said it would have been a good idea:?Now, if you suggest that we print unembellished books and arrange to have them hidden in firemen?s houses all over the country, so that suspicion would be sown among these arsonists, spat I would say! Plant the books, turn in an al arm, and suffer the firemen?s houses burn, is that what you mean? Faber raised his brows and looked at Montag as if he were seeing a new man. I was joking. If you thought it would be a excogitate worth trying, I would have to take your word it would function? (page 86). In this quote, Montag showed that, at this point, he did non really care about what he had to do as long as his problem would have been solved. He was determined to undermine the firemen, go against them, and jail them all to get rid of the firemen structure that stood in his society. In comparison, Montag and I did have many similar personality traits and characteristics. For example, Montag was very open and agonistly to new people that he met. In the beginning of the novel, he met Clarisse away walking exclusively and started a conversation with her. He was not an introvert but an extrovert which showed one of the personality traits I had. One quote showed that he was not shy(p) at all:?He more or less thought he perceive the motion of her hands as she ! walked, and the infinitely small legal now, the white stir of her face turning when she discovered she was a moment away from a man who stood in the midriff of the pavement waiting. Of course, he said, you?re our new neighbor, aren?t you? And you must be---she raised her eyes from his passe-partout symbols---the fireman. ?[?]? I?d---I?d have known it with my eyes shut, she said, slowly. What---the sense of kerosene? My wife always complains, he laughed. You never brush it off completely? (page 5-6). This quote showed that he was friendly to strangers that he met. He was not shy at all and started conversations with them not being rude or obnoxious. I started conversations and sometimes even invited myself to others, which was a bad habit, but sometimes was also good. Hypothetically, the one prominent thing that I saw in Montag?s future that I saw in mine was being able to change the person I once was. For example, Montag was a book burner, until he met Clarisse who posed the brain ?why?? to him. This oppugn made Montag wonder for what reason was he burning books. Was it because he was told to do it? Or was it the right reason and better for the people? I saw this question being posed to myself and qualification me realize what large-hearted of person I was, and what kind of person I was going to become. On the same topic, Montag was also a very thoughtful and unselfish person. This character trait was something that we also had in common. For example, when Montag had the grass-like device in his ear when he was dig by Beatty, Beatty had taken the device from Montag and said he would get it traced and drop in on his friend. This was another reason that led Montag to commit murder and kill Beatty. Montag did not want his friend to be involved because it was all his idea to go on with the plan. I would have done the same if I was in a situation like his, and I have done similar things like this. I would not exploit someone who was a part of my acti ons for I was the one who was caught. In one quote Mo! ntag showed how thoughtful he was:?Montag, get out of there! said Faber. Montag listened. Beatty struck him a blow on the lintel that sent him reeling back. The green smoke ?[?]? fell to the sidewalk. Beatty snatched it up ?[?]? held it half in, half out of his ear. Montag hear the distant voice calling, Montag you all right? Beatty switched the green bullet off ?[?]? Well---so there?s more here than I thought. ?[?]? We?ll trace this and drop in on your friend. No! said Montag? (page 118-119). This quote showed that Montag did not let down his friend. He would have sacrificed himself to stop Beatty from killing his accomplice. This was the kind of thoughtfulness I would have shown to my friends or accomplice if I was in his situation. All in all, a character in a novel is honest a character pictured by what the author wants him/her to be. These characters could have many similarities to us alter from personality, physical features, or even the way we think. Many novels have the se characters that have gone through the problems we faced and could connect to us in a way that we can only see. This just goes to show that, even though the character is not real, they compose can be a part of you from the way they were envisioned in the novel. BibliographyFahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay
No comments:
Post a Comment